Super Bowl XLII will be played on Sunday, February 3, 2008 in Glendale, Arizona between the favored New England Patriots and the New York Giants. Heading towards the weekend the spread sits at 12 points and the O/U at 53.5, as Vegas is obviously predicting a fairly high-scoring game by Super Bowl standards. Basically, Vegas is predicting the Patriots will win 33-20. Historical trends suggest that both the spread and the O/U are too high, considering that in the past ten Super Bowl games, only three times has the combined score been over 53 (1997, 2002, 2003), only one of those games involved a high-scoring teams (1997: Denver vs. Green Bay) and none of those games involved the Patriots. Likewise, only three of the past ten Super Bowls have ended in a spread greater than twelve points (1998, 2000, 2002), the victors in all three of those games were defense-oriented teams, and again none of those games featured the Patriots. If we simply sample the three Super Bowl appearances by the Patriots in the past ten years, the final score should be around 25-22 in favor of the Patriots. The bottom line is, the Super Bowl is rarely the high-scoring blowout that Vegas is predicting in this game.
Everybody knows the Patriots are 18-0, and some are already assuming that 19-0 is inevitable, which is pretty humorous considering these teams played a 38-35 game just one month ago where the Giants led the game well into the second half. To further illustrate why the expectation of a Patriot’s blowout may be a fallacy, let me dispel some myths and present some interesting points.
Myth: Most of the talking heads have exclaimed that the two week span between the divisional championships and the Super Bowl is a big advantage for genius-coach Bill Belichick and the New England Patriots.
Truth: The extra week before the Super Bowl almost always favors the underdog, especially when they are playing the New England Patriots.
In 2003, the 17-2 Patriots were huge favorites against the Carolina Panthers, who used the two weeks of preparation to prepare for and play the Patriots to a draw after 60 minutes of football, with Adam Vinatieri kicking the winning 41-yard FG with four seconds left to play. The Patriots won 32-29. Again in 2004, the 17-2 Patriots were huge favorites against the Philadelphia Eagles, who used the two weeks of preparation to get WR Terrell Owens healthy enough to play and were tied with the Patriots after three quarters before falling 24-21.
We have seen the underdog phenomenon repeatedly in recent years, both in the NFL and college football. These football players are elite athletes with big egos, and you can only tell a proud man so many times the he is going to get his butt kicked when the time comes without that man elevating his game to meet the challenge. The Giants know they are capable of beating the Patriots, as they just proved it a few weeks ago. Constant insistence that they are overmatched will only make them more focused. Combine the underdog psychology with the fact that the Giants are nursing some injuries and the Patriots have the most complex offense in the league to prepare for, and you realize that the extra week can only benefit the Giants.
People forget very quickly that the Patriots had two weeks to prepare for the Jacksonville Jaguars in these playoffs, and the Jaguars looked very comfortable both on offense and defense against the Patriots, on the road. Many so-called experts have blasted Jacksonville for their defensive game plan, but that conservative scheme held the Patriots to 31 points despite the fact that New England’s second score was the direct result of a David Garrard fumble deep in his own territory. Jacksonville was also playing without their best defensive lineman (DT Marcus Stroud) and their best linebacker (MLB Mike Peterson). If the Patriots had scored only 31 points against the Giants in Week 17 they would no longer be undefeated, and do not forget that the Patriots scored 35 points in last year’s AFC Championship game and lost. If the Giants hold the Patriots to 31 points this Sunday, they have an excellent chance of winning.
Myth: You cannot successfully blitz Tom Brady.
Truth: The Philadelphia Eagles did just that in Week 12 at Gillette Stadium, the Baltimore Ravens did so the following week on Monday Night Football (MNF), and the New York Jets did the same thing to Brady in Week 15. The juggernaut Patriots offense generated only 24 points at home against the Eagles, 13 points at home against the Jets, and 27 points against the hapless Ravens. Two of those games began with the Patriots returning an interception for a defensive touchdown. In those three games, Tom Brady was 66-119 passing (55.5%) for 777 yards with only three TDs, two INTs, and was sacked seven times. Even more interesting was that in those three games, Brady was outplayed by three backup QBs in the much-maligned A.J. Feeley, Kyle Boller and Chad Pennington, who were a combined 67-103 passing (65%) for 741 yards, five TDs and four INTs, putting the argument that weather was the biggest factor to bed.
The truth is that in the second half of the season, multiple teams have shown that the Patriot offense can be slowed by rushing only four and dropping seven out of the Cover-2 defense (IND, JAX) or with heavy blitzing (BAL, NYJ, PHI). In the first meeting between the Giants and Patriots, the Giants had a short week of preparation, and defensively they seemed to want to blitz but were concerned whether they could do so successfully. Considering that Giants defensive coordinator Steve Spagnuolo is a disciple of Philadelphia’s Jim Johnson, and New York is both healthier and more confident in their secondary than they were several weeks ago, I expect the Giant defense to be more aggressive this time around. They most likely will send more blitzes, while staying in a rather conservative base defense that will resemble the approach that Jacksonville took against the Patriots. I think the Giants will commit to stopping the run on first down with a basic, two-deep safety alignment, and then adjust their level of aggression based on the outcome of those first down plays. In other words, the Giants will play what is often referred to as a bend-but-do-not-break defense.
Myth: The league has not yet caught up to the spread offense run by teams such as the Dallas Cowboys, Green Bay Packers, Indianapolis Colts and New England Patriots.
Truth: The league catches up to everybody and everything. The Patriots have played four teams twice, only one with a winning record, and only once have they scored as many points in the second meeting or won by as large a margin. After beating the Jets 38-14 on the road in Week 1, they escaped 20-10 at Gillette in Week 15. After crushing the Dolphins 49-28 on the road in Week 7, a significantly more depleted Dolphins team was a nuisance and held the Patriots to 28 points in Week 16. In Week 2, the Patriots crushed the Chargers 38-14 at Gillette Stadium. Then in the playoffs against the same team (more depleted) in the same place, the Patriots squeaked out a 21-12 victory. Only the Buffalo Bills failed the close the gap significantly the second time they saw that Patriot offense.
The New York Giants are also a great example how it takes less than one season for a defenses to catch up to new offensive schemes. In Week 1, the New York Giants gave up 45 points at Dallas in a loss, then cut the Cowboys output to 31 points in Week 10, and finally went back to Dallas in the playoffs and held them to 17 points. In Week 2 the Giants were blown out at home by the Green Bay Packers, 35-13, then traveled to Lambeau Field in the playoffs and held that same outfit to twenty points in an overtime win.
So if we take all that information, we find that three out of four teams that faced the Patriots a second time cut New England’s offensive productivity by at least 17 points, and that in three rematches against teams that defeated them earlier in the season, the Giants cut the output of those teams’ spread offense by at least two touchdowns each time. If this significant trend continues it suggests that the Patriots will only score 24 points against the Giants in the Super Bowl. Maybe Plaxico Burress’ prediction of a 23-17 Giants victory has some rational backing, although the Patriots scoring only 17 points on a fast turf seems a little extreme to me. The Giants have scored an average of 23 PPG in the playoffs, so maybe that is where Burress is getting his numbers.
So Plaxico Burress had made his prediction, so let me make mine. As I have mentioned, I think the extra week will work in favor of the Giants, while the conditions in Arizona really should benefit both teams, as it will make the Giant pass rushers look faster just as it will the Patriot receivers. We all know Eli Manning plays much better in the warm weather, what QB doesn’t, and the fast turf should create some opportunities in the return game, where I feel the Giants are better equipped to take advantage.
The bottom line here is that these teams played a closely contested game just one month ago, and since that time I feel the Giants have improved as a team. The Giants have also played three games on the road against better defenses than they will see in the New England Patriots. Two of those games came in difficult conditions. So I guess my whole point is that if the Giants offense could move the ball on the road, in a hostile environment, in poor field conditions, you can be sure that they will move the ball against the Patriots. Of course, moving the ball will not be enough. Holding onto the ball for long, sustained drives that result in at least three points is the key to the Giants winning the game. If New York makes five trips to the red zone and comes out with three TDs and two FGs, those 27-points just might be enough against a Patriots offense that only gets limited touches.
Vegas Prediction: 33-20 Patriots
Burress Prediction: 23-17 Giants
Super Bowl Trend: 25-22 Patriots
Playoff Trend: 22-19 Patriots
Rematch Trend: 31-24 Giants
My Prediction: 28-27 Giants